Come July it is the time for appraisals in your company and
for me it is time to start the recruitment drive for my team. Every year I scan
through a high number of bio-data with all adjectives put in between those power
resume words. In fact every resume that I scan would in total exceed the skill
sets of Kernighan, Ritchie and Stoutstrup put together with.
I would like to question the very thought as to why should I
use those words when both the parties (receiver and sender) know that there is
not an iota of truth in it. Why can’t I just send an email stating “Dear
Employer, I want a job and I know to use CTRL-C and CTRL-V and sometimes CTRL-ALT-DEL.”
This is perfectly matching my team’s requirements. Why should I go through a
complete grueling session called “Inter-View” and so called “Technical
Discussion” to select few guys who by the next July would be retyping their curriculum
vitiate.
In my view, the entire HR department can be done away with,
and save those money to buy new hardware for the project engineers to work and
create some revenue for the company. So with this context let me take you
through some of those over-abused words that you may find in the next bio-data
that you get through the referrals.
1.
Creative:
Why is that every engineer or a MCA in this planet is creative? Or why is it
necessary for someone to be really creative to work in Mainframes or in embedded
platform? I don’t think the company is going to pay you more than the others
just because you are creative. In fact for me, if a guy is really creative he
would not be in software. End of story.
2.
Effective:
How does one define what is effectiveness or how am I to find out if you really
are? I can guess from the way you draw the block diagram of a DVD player if you
are capable or not. Even my 4 year old kid knows more than me on how to effectively
use Blu-ray player, so effectiveness is not that good a thing to posses.
3.
Track
record: This word is purely used since it cannot be validated even if the
person gave me 1 year to verify. One really does not know what record is the
person talking about and what track has he accomplished something. Think why
should a proven track record person change? Do you think the Australian cricket
team would take Harbajan when he has a track of proven records [of not taking
wickets when needed]?
4.
Motivated:
I would like to know what he is motivated to. Obviously it is for money but the
lies that flow from the person’s mouth is a treat to watch. If everyone in my
team was motivated and had good track record, then there is no scope for me
[Project Manager].
5.
Innovative:
For sure I would not even look beyond this word if a person as used it in his
resume. If he was so innovative, why is he still using an age old medium to
showcase his skills? I would rather recruit a guy who flashes an SMS via his
iPhone with the text message “24 Lakhs PA + Car + Perks, 2 months paid leave.
Accept or Reject” or “I am ready to accept salary or you ready to pay it?” These
type of guys are really innovative ...
6.
Problem
solving: My perception is that any new entrant into a running system would
be the problem creator. If that being the case, how could the same person be
the problem solver? I do not want to talk about these guys who are fit for nothing;
the only problem they can solve is how you can close down the project before
its actual date. If a person cannot solve his problem in the previous company,
how is he going to do it in mine?
7.
Dynamic: Software work to my knowledge
is a purely sedentary job and I wonder what I would do with a dynamic person? I
may have to keep running from pillar to post to locate this person for the
project status. I would like people who are stationary and sloppy so that I can
mentor them and grow my career in the organisation. People who are dynamic are
not aligning to my interests.
8.
Results-oriented:
I do not really understand what this phrase means? Is there someone who would
do anything without the knowledge of the end result or wanting to achieve some
result, I have not seen one yet expect our current Prime Minister?
9.
Team
player: What does one mean by this? If he is a team player, then why is he
applying for a new job all alone, without informing his team? If this is what
team player means, I am sure we can run the project without persons like him.
10.
Responsible
For: All of us are in the same understanding I suppose. I thought of using
the same page [another abused word in IT] but restricted myself. The
understanding that you are responsible for our work items. Is this an
extra-ordinary trait that you were responsible for high-level design, improving
quality etc. I thought it was a basic expectation from the management that all faults are yours.
11.
Extensive
experience: My understanding of experience was that it would come only if
you were exposed to something extensively. Many resources would say they have
worked extensively in cutting edge technology which was released only 6 months
back. God only knows how they were trained on subject before it is known.
12.
Communication
skills: The final nail in his coffin, communication skills I thought was
written and oral in my days, but now-a-days SMS and short emails are known as
communication skills. To talk to the team member sitting next to you, you have
to call him on his mobile since you cannot communicate face-to-face. One exception
is if the team member is of the opposite sex.
So the final conclusion that I have made is to search for
these words and directly thrash the profiles and look for someone who is creatively
innovative, exposed and future oriented. Of course there is one exception for
me too. [If you can catch my drift]